Depending on degree of intervention of the state in economy

  In a mixed economy both the government and the private sector

(business and consumers) play mportant roles in answering the

“what”, “how” and “for whom” questions for society as a whole.

  Depending on degree of intervention of the state in economy and

private sector roles different models of mixed economy differ. We

will consider some of them.

  The American model is based on encouragement of private business

and high incomes of the most active part of the population. The most

part of national manufacture is necessary on a private sector. The state

creates a comprehensible standard of living for needy, but the social

equality problem at all doesn't cost. The question on an optimum level

of the state intervention is object of long and intense discussion. This

model is based on a high labor productivity level and mass orientation

of people to achievement of personal success.

  The Swedish model. It would be possible to name it an antipode

American, differs strong social policy which is directed on reduction

of a property inequality of people at the expense of riches redistribution

in interests of the least provided. The basic part of the goods and services

is made with active intervention of the state, and at redistribution of

incomes the State expenditure makes to 50 % from gross national product

at high level of the taxation. This model has received the name of "functional

socialization", or on to twist Swedish "socialism" at which manufacture

function lays down on private concerns, and function of maintenance of a

high standard of living (employment, education, social insurance) - on the

state. As consequence in the country a rate of unemployment - one of the

lowest in the world; appreciably leveled current incomes of the population.

But recently even more often economists and politicians say that similar

"charitable" activity of the state negatively influences business activity,

constraining it.

  Social market economy of Germany. This model was generated on the

basis of liquidation of major concerns of times of fascism and granting to

all forms of business (large, average, small) possibilities for a sustainable

development. The especial attention gives the state to support of small and

average business for increase of efficiency of functioning of a market

mechanism. The government actively influences the prices, duties, technical

norms; provides preservation of the environment. He plays the big role the

decision of social problems.

  The mixed economic system of Great Britain. Three quarters of production

of this country it is made in a private sector though many markets function

under rigid governmental control. The state takes part in redistribution of

incomes through system of taxes and grants, and also makes the public goods.

Features of economic system of Ukraine.

  What system exists at the moment in Ukraine? It is very important for all of

us and very much a complicated question. In Ukraine last years market

transformations have begun, on the basis of privatization and privatization

processes there was a private sector (basically the small and average enterprises)

which exists near to the large state enterprises. Market relations develop, which

incorporate to the rests is command a management system. In this connection it

is possible to name economic system of Ukraine eclectic or "transitive". First, it

consists of elements of command system, market system of an epoch of a free

competition and modern market system. Secondly, in economic system of the

country all time there are intensive changes. Thirdly, this transition is long on

time; there were already some models of such transition (East Europe, Baltic,

Chinese and etc.).

  The definitive choice of concrete model of transition to mixed economy in

Ukraine will be defined finally by a parity of political forces in the country,

character and intensity of market transformations, scales and efficiency of

support of the Ukrainian reforms, the international commonwealth, and also

historical and national traditions.

   In a mixed economy both the government and the private sector

(business and consumers) play mportant roles in answering the

“what”, “how” and “for whom” questions for society as a whole.

  Depending on degree of intervention of the state in economy and

private sector roles different models of mixed economy differ. We

will consider some of them.

  The American model is based on encouragement of private business

and high incomes of the most active part of the population. The most

part of national manufacture is necessary on a private sector. The state

creates a comprehensible standard of living for needy, but the social

equality problem at all doesn't cost. The question on an optimum level

of the state intervention is object of long and intense discussion. This

model is based on a high labor productivity level and mass orientation

of people to achievement of personal success.

  The Swedish model. It would be possible to name it an antipode

American, differs strong social policy which is directed on reduction

of a property inequality of people at the expense of riches redistribution

in interests of the least provided. The basic part of the goods and services

is made with active intervention of the state, and at redistribution of

incomes the State expenditure makes to 50 % from gross national product

at high level of the taxation. This model has received the name of "functional

socialization", or on to twist Swedish "socialism" at which manufacture

function lays down on private concerns, and function of maintenance of a

high standard of living (employment, education, social insurance) - on the

state. As consequence in the country a rate of unemployment - one of the

lowest in the world; appreciably leveled current incomes of the population.

But recently even more often economists and politicians say that similar

"charitable" activity of the state negatively influences business activity,

constraining it.

  Social market economy of Germany. This model was generated on the

basis of liquidation of major concerns of times of fascism and granting to

all forms of business (large, average, small) possibilities for a sustainable

development. The especial attention gives the state to support of small and

average business for increase of efficiency of functioning of a market

mechanism. The government actively influences the prices, duties, technical

norms; provides preservation of the environment. He plays the big role the

decision of social problems.

  The mixed economic system of Great Britain. Three quarters of production

of this country it is made in a private sector though many markets function

under rigid governmental control. The state takes part in redistribution of

incomes through system of taxes and grants, and also makes the public goods.

Features of economic system of Ukraine.

  What system exists at the moment in Ukraine? It is very important for all of

us and very much a complicated question. In Ukraine last years market

transformations have begun, on the basis of privatization and privatization

processes there was a private sector (basically the small and average enterprises)

which exists near to the large state enterprises. Market relations develop, which

incorporate to the rests is command a management system. In this connection it

is possible to name economic system of Ukraine eclectic or "transitive". First, it

consists of elements of command system, market system of an epoch of a free

competition and modern market system. Secondly, in economic system of the

country all time there are intensive changes. Thirdly, this transition is long on

time; there were already some models of such transition (East Europe, Baltic,

Chinese and etc.).

  The definitive choice of concrete model of transition to mixed economy in

Ukraine will be defined finally by a parity of political forces in the country,

character and intensity of market transformations, scales and efficiency of

support of the Ukrainian reforms, the international commonwealth, and also

historical and national traditions.

   In a mixed economy both the government and the private sector

(business and consumers) play mportant roles in answering the

“what”, “how” and “for whom” questions for society as a whole.

  Depending on degree of intervention of the state in economy and

private sector roles different models of mixed economy differ. We

will consider some of them.

  The American model is based on encouragement of private business

and high incomes of the most active part of the population. The most

part of national manufacture is necessary on a private sector. The state

creates a comprehensible standard of living for needy, but the social

equality problem at all doesn't cost. The question on an optimum level

of the state intervention is object of long and intense discussion. This

model is based on a high labor productivity level and mass orientation

of people to achievement of personal success.

  The Swedish model. It would be possible to name it an antipode

American, differs strong social policy which is directed on reduction

of a property inequality of people at the expense of riches redistribution

in interests of the least provided. The basic part of the goods and services

is made with active intervention of the state, and at redistribution of

incomes the State expenditure makes to 50 % from gross national product

at high level of the taxation. This model has received the name of "functional

socialization", or on to twist Swedish "socialism" at which manufacture

function lays down on private concerns, and function of maintenance of a

high standard of living (employment, education, social insurance) - on the

state. As consequence in the country a rate of unemployment - one of the

lowest in the world; appreciably leveled current incomes of the population.

But recently even more often economists and politicians say that similar

"charitable" activity of the state negatively influences business activity,

constraining it.

  Social market economy of Germany. This model was generated on the

basis of liquidation of major concerns of times of fascism and granting to

all forms of business (large, average, small) possibilities for a sustainable

development. The especial attention gives the state to support of small and

average business for increase of efficiency of functioning of a market

mechanism. The government actively influences the prices, duties, technical

norms; provides preservation of the environment. He plays the big role the

decision of social problems.

  The mixed economic system of Great Britain. Three quarters of production

of this country it is made in a private sector though many markets function

under rigid governmental control. The state takes part in redistribution of

incomes through system of taxes and grants, and also makes the public goods.

Features of economic system of Ukraine.

  What system exists at the moment in Ukraine? It is very important for all of

us and very much a complicated question. In Ukraine last years market

transformations have begun, on the basis of privatization and privatization

processes there was a private sector (basically the small and average enterprises)

which exists near to the large state enterprises. Market relations develop, which

incorporate to the rests is command a management system. In this connection it

is possible to name economic system of Ukraine eclectic or "transitive". First, it

consists of elements of command system, market system of an epoch of a free

competition and modern market system. Secondly, in economic system of the

country all time there are intensive changes. Thirdly, this transition is long on

time; there were already some models of such transition (East Europe, Baltic,

Chinese and etc.).

  The definitive choice of concrete model of transition to mixed economy in

Ukraine will be defined finally by a parity of political forces in the country,

character and intensity of market transformations, scales and efficiency of

support of the Ukrainian reforms, the international commonwealth, and also

historical and national traditions.

   In a mixed economy both the government and the private sector

(business and consumers) play mportant roles in answering the

“what”, “how” and “for whom” questions for society as a whole.

  Depending on degree of intervention of the state in economy and

private sector roles different models of mixed economy differ. We

will consider some of them.

  The American model is based on encouragement of private business

and high incomes of the most active part of the population. The most

part of national manufacture is necessary on a private sector. The state

creates a comprehensible standard of living for needy, but the social

equality problem at all doesn't cost. The question on an optimum level

of the state intervention is object of long and intense discussion. This

model is based on a high labor productivity level and mass orientation

of people to achievement of personal success.

  The Swedish model. It would be possible to name it an antipode

American, differs strong social policy which is directed on reduction

of a property inequality of people at the expense of riches redistribution

in interests of the least provided. The basic part of the goods and services

is made with active intervention of the state, and at redistribution of

incomes the State expenditure makes to 50 % from gross national product

at high level of the taxation. This model has received the name of "functional

socialization", or on to twist Swedish "socialism" at which manufacture

function lays down on private concerns, and function of maintenance of a

high standard of living (employment, education, social insurance) - on the

state. As consequence in the country a rate of unemployment - one of the

lowest in the world; appreciably leveled current incomes of the population.

But recently even more often economists and politicians say that similar

"charitable" activity of the state negatively influences business activity,

constraining it.

  Social market economy of Germany. This model was generated on the

basis of liquidation of major concerns of times of fascism and granting to

all forms of business (large, average, small) possibilities for a sustainable

development. The especial attention gives the state to support of small and

average business for increase of efficiency of functioning of a market

mechanism. The government actively influences the prices, duties, technical

norms; provides preservation of the environment. He plays the big role the

decision of social problems.

  The mixed economic system of Great Britain. Three quarters of production

of this country it is made in a private sector though many markets function

under rigid governmental control. The state takes part in redistribution of

incomes through system of taxes and grants, and also makes the public goods.

Features of economic system of Ukraine.

  What system exists at the moment in Ukraine? It is very important for all of

us and very much a complicated question. In Ukraine last years market

transformations have begun, on the basis of privatization and privatization

processes there was a private sector (basically the small and average enterprises)

which exists near to the large state enterprises. Market relations develop, which

incorporate to the rests is command a management system. In this connection it

is possible to name economic system of Ukraine eclectic or "transitive". First, it

consists of elements of command system, market system of an epoch of a free

competition and modern market system. Secondly, in economic system of the

country all time there are intensive changes. Thirdly, this transition is long on

time; there were already some models of such transition (East Europe, Baltic,

Chinese and etc.).

  The definitive choice of concrete model of transition to mixed economy in

Ukraine will be defined finally by a parity of political forces in the country,

character and intensity of market transformations, scales and efficiency of

support of the Ukrainian reforms, the international commonwealth, and also

historical and national traditions.